Wasserman White Family Law named among 2024 Best Women-Owned Businesses in Maryland

Read Article →

What E.N. v. T.R. Means for De Facto Parents

The case E.N. v. T.R., decided by the Maryland Court of Appeals, clarifies important requirements for de facto parent status.

What The Court Decided

In E.N. v. T.R., the Maryland Court of Appeals addressed precisely what happens when a child has two legal parents. The Court held that:

  • Both legal parents must consent (or foster) the establishment of a parent-like relationship unless the non-consenting parent is shown to be unfit or there are exceptional circumstances.
  • That consent can be express (clearly stated) or implied, but it must be knowing and voluntary.
  • The court said it’s critical to protect the constitutional rights of both legal parents to raise their children.

Why T.R. Was Denied De Facto Parent Status

In E.N. v. T.R., because one parent never consented or fostered the relationship, the Court rejected de facto parent status, even though T.R. had done many things similar to a parent.

If you are navigating parental rights or considering a de facto parent claim in Maryland, contact Wasserman White Family Law to discuss your options.

Need legal assistance?

Work with Our Team of Experienced Attorneys

Disclaimer: Opinions and conclusions in these blog posts are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated. The information contained in this blog is general in nature and is not offered and cannot be considered as legal advice for any particular situation. For legal advice, you should directly consult a lawyer to discuss the specific facts of your matter. By reading this blog, you acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the author. Any links provided are for informational purposes only and by doing so, the author does not adopt or incorporate the contents. The author is the legal copyright holder of all materials on the blog, and they cannot be repurposed without permission.

Related Posts

Disclaimer: Opinions and conclusions in these blog posts are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated. The information contained in this blog is general in nature and is not offered and cannot be considered as legal advice for any particular situation. For legal advice, you should directly consult a lawyer to discuss the specific facts of your matter. By reading this blog, you acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the author. Any links provided are for informational purposes only and by doing so, the author does not adopt or incorporate the contents. The author is the legal copyright holder of all materials on the blog, and they cannot be repurposed without permission.